Java: Integer or int?
When I first saw primitive types like int
or boolean
mixed up with classes, I was very tempted to convert all primitives into Integer
, Boolean
and so on to maintain a clear coding style. But reading articles on the Internet and IntelliJ hints stopped me from doing such a stupid thing.
I read this wonderful rule of thumb:
Don’t create unnecessary objects.
Primivites always occupy less memory than objects, which was clearly described in this article on primitives. Maybe we don’t usually care about the memory usage, but if we process big amounts of data, every byte can count. Moreover, accessing primitives is faster because they are stored on the stack, not on the heap.
It’s also important to remember that a variable pointing to an Integer
or Boolean
object can be null
. A primitive can’t. This difference matters for example when you retrieve data from an SQL database which allows NULLs. If you try to assign null
to a primitive, you’ll get a Null Pointer Exception. That’s a bug I noticed and fixed in a production system. So I always try to restrict the possibility to use NULLs in the database and in the code unless null
has a real business meaning.